Coronavirus disease 2019 and human reproduction: a changing perspective

Since the outbreak of severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the coronavirus disease 2019 has had a wide range of effects on human health. This paper summarizes the data related to the effects of the SARS-CoV-2 infection on human reproduction. Both the male and female reproductive tract express high levels of receptors and proteins needed for viral cell entry. There is presently no evidence that gametes are affected by the infection. Male fertility may be temporarily reduced due to inflammatory responses following infection. The endometrium is highly susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 cell entry; however, it remains unclear whether this could alter receptivity and embryo implantation. Menstrual cycle changes were reported in women who experienced severe infection; however, they tended to be reversible. For couples undergoing assisted reproduction treatment, the pandemic led to a significant psychological burden, with changes in lifestyle that could directly affect the success of the treatment. Human reproduction societies recommend screening all patients prior to cycle initiation and avoiding treatment of women with severe comorbidities until the pandemic is under control. Finally, for pregnant women, it is expected that the infection is more severe in women in the third trimester and in those with comorbidities. Those who are symptomatic for SARS-CoV-2 are more likely to have increased rates of prematurity and intrapartum fetal distress than those who are asymptomatic. Vertical transmission cannot be completely ruled out, but neonatal infection rates are low. Vaccination appears to be safe and is indicated for use in pregnant and lactating women because the benefits outweigh the risks.

Metabolic syndrome in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: prevalence, characteristics and predictors

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in women with polycystic ovary syndrome, as well as its characteristics and predictors. Seventh-three women, with body mass index of 30.4 ± 7.8 kg/m² and 25.0 ± 6.0 years old, subdivided according to body mass index, were studied retrospectively. There was no significant mean age difference among body mass index groups (p = 0.228). Prevalence of metabolic syndrome was 38.4 percent, with a null prevalence for normal (n = 18), 23.8 percent for overweight (n = 17), 62.9 percent for obese (n = 28), and 85.5 percent for morbidly obese women (n = 7). Women with metabolic syndrome were older than women without metabolic syndrome (27.3 ± 5.3 vs. 24.2 ± 4.6 vs. years old; p = 0.031) and presented a higher body mass index (36.3 ± 7.7 vs. 26.9 ± 5.4; p < 0.001). There was no difference for degree of hirsutism and menstrual patterns between women with and without metabolic syndrome (p = 0.593 and p = 0.119, respectively). Regarding laboratory parameters, DHEAS was lower (1,646 ± 1,007 vs. 2,594 ± 1,563; p = 0.007) and HOMA-IR were higher (9.9 ± 9.7 vs. 4.6 ± 4.7; p = 0.004) in women with metabolic syndrome (p = 0.031 and p < 0.001, respectively). The best predictors of metabolic syndrome were waist circumference > 88 cm, HDL-cholesterol < 50 mg/dL and triglycerides > 150 mg/dL.

O objetivo deste estudo foi o de determinar a prevalência, características e preditores da síndrome metabólica em mulheres com a síndrome dos ovários policísticos. Setenta e três mulheres, com índice de massa corporal de 30,4 ± 7,8 kg/m² e 25,0 ± 6,0 anos de idade, subdivididas de acordo com o índice de massa corporal, foram estudadas retrospectivamente. Não se observou diferença significativa de idade entre os grupos (p = 0,228). A prevalência da síndrome metabólica foi de 38,4 por cento, estando ausente nas mulheres com índice de massa corporal normal (n = 18) e presente em 23,8 por cento das com sobrepeso (n = 17), 62,9 por cento das obesas (n = 28) e 85,5 por cento das obesas mórbidas (n = 7). Quando comparadas, as mulheres com síndrome metabólica apresentaram uma idade mais avançada (27,3 ± 5,3 vs. 24,2 ± 4,6 anos; p = 0,031) e um índice de massa corporal maior (36,3 ± 7,7 vs. 26,9 ± 5,4; p < 0,001) que as mulheres sem a síndrome, não havendo diferença significativa com relação ao grau de hirsutismo (p = 0,593) e padrão menstrual (p = 0,119). Com relação aos parâmetros laboratoriais, a concentração de DHEAS foi menor (1.646 ± 1.007 vs. 2.594 ± 1.563; p = 0,007) e o valor do HOMA-IR foi maior (9,9 ± 9,7 vs. 4,6 ± 4,7; p = 0,004) nas pacientes com a síndrome metabólica. Os melhores preditores para a presença da síndrome metabólica foram a circunferência abdominal > 88 cm, HDL-colesterol < 50 mg/dL e triglicérides > 150 mg/dL.